1. Dunham & Pierce’s Leadership Process Model

The Dunham and Pierce Leadership Process Model doesn’t necessarily seek to define leadership, but it does the job indirectly. This model addresses all of the key elements that play a role in leadership, and helps the manager to understand how each part affects the other parts of the equation.


Leadership will never be simple, but using this model is a good way to ‘get your head around’ the various moving parts and hopefully bring it into better focus in your mind. According to Dunham and Pierce, there are four factors that play a role in the leadership process.

  1. Leader – the person in charge of a project or team, regardless of what their title may be. That person may be referred to as an owner, a manager, a V.P., or any other title that confers power and responsibility. The important thing is that they are the person who a group of others answer to, and it is their performance that we are worried about with this model.

  2. Followers – the people who are being led. Generally, these will be employees of the company in question. Most commonly, the Followers for a specific manager fall within a group or division of the company. The performance that the Leader is able to coax out of the Followers, will largely be responsible for the outcomes that are achieved.

  3. Context – refers to the circumstances under which the Leader is managing his or her team. Whether it is a project that will run for a predetermined length of time, or simply employees working on a day-to-day basis, the context of leadership plays an important part in what style of management is going to be most successful. This is an element that is often skipped over in some leadership models and discussions. 4. Outcomes – the results of any project or task that has been worked on by the Followers under direction of the Leader. For example, if a well-defined project has been worked on for two months, the success or failure of that project will be considered an Outcome. Above all else, leaders tend to be judged on their Outcomes because they usually have the most direct influence over the bottom line. If you are a manager within an organization, it is probably your Outcomes that you spend most of your time concerned with.



If there is an overreaching theme of this model you should take away, it is that all of the aspects of leadership are interconnected in one way or another by a circular rather than linear relationship.

Your actions as the Leader will affect your followers + Your Followers actions are likely to affect you as a Leader (& your management style) + Learn from your team and how their actions dictate the Context and the Outcomes = A better chance of success.

So what does this have to do with management from a practical sense? It should serve as notice that everything done within the context of a leadership situation is important, and it all comes around in the end in one form or another. Things that are done to help the team and empower the individuals on a team can serve to improve future outcomes, while any negativity is likely to manifest in unwanted ways. Taking a holistic approach to management can be powerful when it comes to guiding a team towards long-term success.

This model has plenty to teach leaders and managers in a variety of settings, but some of the most important lessons are:

Grow relationships within the team.

Since this model of leadership is circular in nature, it only makes sense that growing relationships well help everyone perform better. When the relationships are strong from the top down, communication will benefit and the team should work more efficiently as a whole.

Let people do what they do best.

This is key for any leader, no matter what context they are working in. When people are able to spend time working on projects that they feel comfortable with and that match up with their skill sets, they tend to be happier (and perform better). When leaders fail to consider the skills of their people, it should be no surprise that the results lag.

Offer feedback.

This point goes along with the point regarding relationships among the team. Feedback is valuable because it helps to steer the members of the team in the right direction, in a positive way. Opening the lines of feedback helps the Followers learn what is expected from them, and also gives them an opportunity to provide feedback to the Leader – which can be invaluable.

Act Ethically and Honestly.

The circular nature of leadership dictates that it is vitally important to act with a high degree of honesty on a regular basis. When deceit creeps into the system, it is likely to spread, causing a negative effect throughout the organization.

Leadership is complicated and sometimes scattered and chaotic, but the Dunham Pierce Leadership Process Model does a good job of highlighting the key points and identifies how they all affect one another. For the leader who is trying to keep a variety of different interests happy throughout the term of a project, this model can help to sort things out and keep them moving in the right direction.

Key Points

  • The Dunham and Pierce Leadership Process Model addresses all of the key elements that play a role in leadership, and helps the manager to understand how each part affects the other parts of the equation.

  • This model states that there are four factors that play a role in the leadership process: the Leader, the Followers, the Context, and the Outcomes.

  • The meaning of Leader and Followers is self-evident. Context refers to the circumstances under which the Leader is managing his or her team, and Outcomes refers to the results of any project or task that has been worked on by the Followers under direction of the Leader.

  • The model suggests that everything done within the context of a leadership situation is important, and if you are able to learn from your team and how their actions dictate the Context and the Outcomes, everyone will have a better chance at success.

References

  • Richard Hackman, J & Wageman, R. (2004). When and How Team Leaders Matter. Research in Organizational Behavior - RES ORGAN BEH. 26. 37-74. 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26002-6.

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey. (1977). The Ambiguity of Leadership. The Academy of Management Review. 2. 104. 10.2307/257611.

  • Porter, Lyman W., and Edward E. Lawler. 1968. Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, Ill: R.D. Irwin.

  • "Dunham And Pierce's Leadership Process Model". 2018. Free-Management-Ebooks.Com. Accessed September 10 2018. http://www.free-management-ebooks.com/faqld/leadtheory-03.htm.

  • Newton Paul (2016). Leadership Theories Leaderships Skills. Published 2016 by Bookboon .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3. Hersey-Blanchard's Situational Leadership Theory

Image
Right in the name of this leadership theory, you can get a great indication of what it is all about. The term ‘situational’ indicates that: Leaders should vary their approach based on the people they are leading, and the circumstances that surround the task at hand. Indeed, the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory is one that is based around variable leadership, depending on a variety of circumstances. When a leader is able to adapt to the situation as quickly as possible, everyone will benefit in the end.  Specifically, this theory has to do with the maturity of those who are being led. To those who have worked as leaders in the past, it is no surprise that maturity should be considered when working on finding the right leadership style. For example, Someone who is inexperienced in their field, will likely lack the skills or confidence to take on tasks that would be comfortable for a more experienced employee. Only when a leader is able to mold their approach
Read more

10. Why Change Programs Don’t Produce Change

Image
Michael Beer, Russell A. Eisenstat, and Bert Spector Table of Content Table of Content Idea in Brief Idea in Practice 1. Mobilize commitment to change through joint diagnosis of problems 2. Develop a shared vision of how to organize for competitiveness 3. Foster consensus for the new vision, competence to enact it, and cohesion to advance it 4. Spread revitalization to all departments—without pushing from the top 5. Institutionalize revitalization through formal policies, systems, and structures . . . only after your new approach is up and running. 6. Monitor the revitalization process, adjusting in response to problems The Fallacy of Programmatic Change Tracking Corporate Change Extent of revitalization Contrasting assumptions about change Six Steps to Effective Change 1. Mobilize commitment to change through joint diagnosis of business problems. 2. Develop a shared vision of how to organize and manage for competitiveness. 3. F
Read more